Note: this column is not an attack on Jews. I know of many Jews with excellent qualities who constantly stand against Zionist supremacism.
When discussing American politics I often use a simple term: Jewish supremacism, in order to explain many of the stances and policies consistently adopted by the US establishment. What does Jewish supremacism really mean?
In short, it refers to the dominance of American political thought, policy-making and values by a self-interested elite, the overwhelming majority of which is either dominated by, or following, an extremist form of Judaic thought.
Thought which, based off the deliberately deformed remnants of the Talmud and Torah, calls Jesus Christ a bastard, claims Jewish women should wash if they meet a Christian and holds that even animals shouldn’t be near non-Jews. The position of non-Jews (“goyim”) is made clear in Midrasch Talpioth (fol. 225d):
“God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him.”
Abhodah Zarah 22a:
“Animals must not be allowed to go near the Goim, because they are suspected of having intercourse with them. Nor must women cohabit with them because they are over-sexed.”
All this is freely available.
Jewish Supremacists in Power
The claims that Jewish supremacism is a tangible force in American politics is often dismissed by pro-Israel pundits and “Christian Zionists”*, either by allegations of “anti-Semitism” or the claim that Jewish supremacism cannot exist on account of the fact that prominent Jews in America aren’t a coherent force – they’re on all sides of the aisle; they’re not a single political movement.
This is indeed true. There is no one Jewish party in the United States; the country has been divided along the partisan lines of the two party system for decades. A vote for any party that isn’t the Democratic or Republican party is widely seen as a “wasted” vote.
But that’s the whole point. These Jewish supremacists don’t need to have a single political party or a single movement in order to succeed. That’s because they play all sides of the spectrum. Some of them even invent themselves as the “anti-establishment” candidate in order to pull in minority votes (specifically Muslims and Hispanics).
Let’s take Beria – I’m sorry, Bernie Sanders. Sanders has, through his passionate attacks on The Donald, managed to build up a huge support base among both Democratic voters and liberals. A popular liberal of Jewish origins, he has a huge young following.
Muslims like him for opposing Trump’s stated goal of banning them from entry to the US. Hispanics like him for his opposition to the infamous wall. Women like him for his opposition to Trump’s odiousness. What could go wrong?
On the other side of the isle to Sanders have sat men like Eric Cantor, the Jewish minority leader who openly supported those wars (Bernie chose to back their financing in private), opposed loosening access to healthcare, opposes gun control and more.
Cantor was criticised for taking the side of Netanyahu over the White House; his involvement in subverting his own government’s policies on Israel’s behalf was described by Steve Benen as something that would be scandalous “if our political system made more sense”.
Religion aside, men like Cantor seem to be the antithesis of Bernie, right? Wrong.
In reality, Sanders is more dangerous than Cantor because he puts up a facade that appeals to impressionable youths of all backgrounds. A facade that appears to be “anti-establishment”, but (as we’ve seen in his collaboration with the Clintons) is anything but.
The Muslim and “anti-war” crowds have failed to notice that Sanders ardently supports Israel, supports the continuation of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (even if it would mean fewer boots) and would (if leader) maintain the ties to those puppet regimes.
Sanders is also supportive of Assad; he combines denouncing Assad’s enemies with furious objections to any intervention against him (even though such intervention is actually carried out in support of Assad). Flying air support missions for the IRGC, however, is perfectly fine.
Remember what the Jewish Communist Lenin said: the best way to control the opposition is to lead it yourself. This is exactly what these Jewish supremacists do.
Let’s look at the current situation. Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner sits in Trump’s camp, supposedly a loyal follower. Jewish billionaire George Soros posits himself as his liberal-democratic enemy, while behind the scenes he’s funding Kushner and keeping him afloat!
All the while, Kushner sits aloof in the White House with any number of completely undeserved portfolios among day-drinking Republicans. This is in spite being a longtime democrat with only a faltering real estate career on his resume.
Jill Stein posits herself as the “alternative” Green Party candidate, yet backs Assad and strongly backs Russian President Putin – just like Trump. She differs in her domestic approach, but falls in behind the rest against the innocent and common enemies. Trump chimed in with approval of Bernie and Stein’s foreign policy ideas.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein posited himself as an independent actor by appointing special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russian meddling in the US election, when he himself dismissed Comey on Trump’s behalf. Now Rosenstein, sensing the changing mood, has authorised Mueller to prosecute Trump if need be!
These Jewish supremacists are playing all sides and taking the “goyim” for fools. Which, in America, most of them are. Muslims included.
They distract us from the intrigue by spreading degeneracy, from pornography and the supposed wonders of homosexuality to gambling, movies and hedonistic music. People are too busy satiating their desires to notice (or want to notice) what’s going on. These supremacists literally believe corrupting “goy” enemies is part of their faith. They promote filth, create a demand for it among gentiles, then profit from it.
Jewish scholar Maimonides even argued that taking interest from Jews is prohibited due to its harmful nature, but taking it from the non-Jews to harm them is obligatory. These figures are key influences on Orthodox Jews, Kushner among them.
In fact, according to contemporary Jewish law, a Jew who even murders a Gentile is guilty only of a sin against the laws of Heaven, not punishable by a court. Some rabbinical commentators claimed that in wartime all Gentiles belonging to a hostile population may (or should) be killed. This attitude influenced the current IDF.
Jewish Professor Nathan Abrams explained (in a publication meant for their audience) the involvement of some Jewish supremacists in pornography (for instance) as
an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.
Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction.
In this context, Sanders’ leftist thought (which includes support for the legalisation of marajuana, same-sex marriage and more) becomes more sinister.
These power brokers sit on both sides of the aisle and posit themselves as totally opposed to each other. They may squabble over finite differences, but at the end of the day they’re united in their own tribal interests, united in screwing over the “goyim”.
Will they differ over health care and guns? Sure. Will they differ over how much worship of Israel the untermensch must carry out? No. This trend is unanimous from America to Hungary. Deference to these elitists is the key to power.
*Colonel Rabbi A. Avidan (Zemel), Tohar hannesheq le’or hahalakhah (‘Purity of weapons in the light of the Halakhah’)
*The deference of so-called “Christian Zionists” is made all the more pathetic due to the attitude of Jews towards Jesus himself. Rabbis of the past even changed the Talmud to claim Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to commit idolatry and showing contempt for rabbinical authority. Classical Jewish sources do not shy from mentioning this.